Here are your answers compared to this voter’s answers.
科学 › 强制接种疫苗
TJ>TJ Personal answer应该，但仅针对致命的传染病 |
医保 › 精神健康
TJ>TJ Personal answer应该，我们的精神健康护理系统需要更多资金以提供更高质量的关怀和服务 |
科学 › 核能
TJ>TJ Personal answer不，我们应该投资在更清洁的替代能源上，比如风能、水力发电、钍和地热 |
罪行 › 监狱过度拥挤
TJ>TJ Personal answerReform the system instead. The fact that there is overcrowding shows how shit the system is. |
经济 › 经济刺激
TJ>TJ Personal answer是的，并将所有行业集体化 |
外交政策 › 义务兵役
TJ>TJ Personal answer不应该，服务应该是一种选择而不是一项义务 |
外交政策 › 军费支出
TJ>TJ Personal answer减少 |
交通运输 › 公共交通
TJ>TJ Personal answer是，但前提是开支用于环境友好的解决方案 |
社会 › 堕胎
TJ>TJ Personal answer主张堕胎合法，提供节育、性教育以及更多社会服务能帮助减少堕胎数量 |
罪行 › 运输毒品罪处以的刑罚
TJ>TJ Personal answerOnly if they have done something capable of this punishment. |
国内政策 › 毒品政策
TJ>TJ Personal answer是的，并且追溯以往来减少对那些已经服刑的判决 |
罪行 › 罪犯投票权
TJ>TJ Personal answerYes, but only after completing their sentences and parole/probation. Also, it depends on the crime. |
移民 › 公民考试
TJ>TJ Personal answerIt should be based on how the country works. |
移民 › 技术移民
TJ>TJ Personal answerNo, make sure citizens are qualified while also letting in people. |
国内政策 › 任期限制
TJ>TJ Personal answerReform to a proportional representation system. |
国家安全 › Foreign Assassination
TJ>TJ Personal answerOnly proven terrorists. |
移民 › 移民同化
TJ>TJ Personal answerThey should be encouraged while native born people should be encouraged to learn Spanish. |
社会 › 安乐死
TJ>TJ Personal answer是，但必须经过心理测试，确定他们完全理解这种选择的后果才可以 |
环境 › 水力压裂法
TJ>TJ Personal answer不，我们应该寻求更可持续的能源 |
经济 › 税
TJ>TJ Personal answerEradicate billionaires. Those making more than a certain amount should be paying more in taxes. Also, remove the tax loopholes for large corporations. |
外交政策 › 外国援助
TJ>TJ Personal answerDecrease, only give it to those with zero human rights violations. |
经济 › 公司税
TJ>TJ Personal answer大型跨国企业有所增加而小企业低一些 |
Here is how you compare to this voter on popular political themes.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 2 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 2 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 2 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 2 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 最不 important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 最不 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 最不 important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 最不 important to you.
Here is how you compare to this voter on the traditional ideological axis.
iSideWith.com is the world’s most popular voting guide for citizens to find information about elections, political parties, candidates, voting districts and popular political issues in their country. We are independent and not affiliated with any investors, shareholders, political parties or interest groups.
© 2025 iSideWith.com. All rights reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our user agreement and privacy policy. iSideWith.com may earn a portion of sales from products that are purchased through our site as part of our affiliate partnerships with retailers. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of iSideWith.com.
